![the carter 1 zip itunes the carter 1 zip itunes](https://blinksabas.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/8/0/138055502/911201351_orig.jpg)
Lawyers for Ms Lowe said it was wrong to show footage of her 'visibly crying, behaving in a way which she would never behave in public' because she was upset by the way bailiffs were handling her possessions and walking on her carpet Mr Bennett told the court that she returned home 'in a state of anxiety' after her former partner phoned to say the agents were 'about to seize her possessions unless she could provide receipts which proved that she owned them. His ex-girlfriend instructed DCBL to recover the debt and High Court Enforcement Agents (HCEAs) appeared at Ms Lowe's flat in Woolwich, south east London, on February 16.Ī film crew accompanied the bailiffs and was invited into the home by her now ex-partner while she was commuting to work. The hearing before Mrs Justice Tipples was told that at the time of filming in February 2016, Ms Lowe lived with her then-partner who owed money to his former girlfriend.
#THE CARTER 1 ZIP ITUNES TV#
William Bennett QC, representing Ms Lowe, told the court that Channel 5, the TV production company and the bailiffs firm had denied her case, but she had accepted an offer to resolve it through their payment of substantial damages and her legal costs. A hearing at the High Court in London on Thursday was told that the legal dispute had been resolved through a settlement. She also sought an injunction preventing it being shown again. Natasha Lowe sued for invasion of privacy after her face was shown during a broadcast of Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away! Ms Lowe accepted giving an interview to film crews, but argues she expected to be consented before it was broadcast